JPS Health Network: A Changing Vision and Communication Lessons

The best way to tour a hospital and check out its fluorescent lighting is from a standing position, not while lying on your back. At least that's what we were told by JPS Health Network President and CEO, Robert Earley.

For the record, he's right.

Robert Earley, 

 JPS Health Network
President and CEO

Recently, the Ft. Worth Chapter of PRSA took its monthly lunch program on the road and got an "unfiltered view tour" [his words] of Tarrant County's public hospital with Mr. Robert Earley. This tour was our chance to hear from this local leader who is using a strategic communication and community outreach campaign to help change hearts and minds about the Tarrant County Hospital District.

"We're in the life and death business," said Earley of the work JPS does for what last year was over 1 million people. "We hope it's more life." 

As the county's public hospital, JPS gets a bit of bad rap. There's a misconception that since it's funded by tax dollars, people tend to think the care would be sub-par and that there's no need to provide additional resources through private funding. To be clear, his pre-tour talk did not come across to me like a fundraising effort. Instead, he just pointed out parallels to other publicly funded institutions getting additional resources from benefactors to programs they support. (cough - college football coaches salaries - cough) Funding challenges are typical for public institutions and there were many of those challenges he inherited.

As for the care, he explains that he wants a cultural shift. They had previously been operating in a realm of mediocrity. "We're not there yet," he said. Earley recognized, "while the care was good, [they] weren't treating people right." So he made some changes and expected more.

He wants JPS to be a place where best-practices in healthcare are created and then followed by others. Earley expects more from his 4,500 employees: "When people walk in the front door, everybody gets respect."

When they hire, he says they take a "360° approach." They want people with the right skill-set and heart.

Robert Earley has Three Rules for the JPS Health Network staff:

1. Own It. He wants staff to be proud of where they work. When they hear about the good, it's ok to share that they work for JPS. When there are challenges, it's still ok to share that they work for JPS.
2. Seek Joy. He wants employees to smile. Ideally, he hopes they have reasons to smile throughout the day. Healthcare can make for a stressful environment, providing clear direction and positivity can go a long way.  
3. Don't Be A Jerk! Earley is on a personal campaign to against "jerkdom." He cites examples in our society where we seem to raise up jerks and jerk-like behavior ahead of being simply good people.

"We are trying to be a transparent organization." Earley is using what I consider to be a smart community relations tactic with on-site tours. One example of this unfiltered view was that we were encouraged to ask any question along the way; anything was fair game. He's proud of JPS being the Level 1 Trauma Center for Tarrant County. We saw operating rooms, including two that stay staffed, stocked, and ready 24-hours a day, seven days a week. Honestly, it's highly impressive.

Here are some additional public relations take-aways from Robert Earley and the JPS tour:

• The JPS team observe other healthcare systems going through challenges and then they look internally to see if they have the same issue(s).
• They want to establish a network by which they can communicate directly with stakeholders and not be reliant on traditional media methods.
• The quality and safety standards as an organization are constantly in need improvement.
• Training is top-notch: A JPS nurse receive approximately $64,000 in training. (Trauma nurses get double that amount!) The problem they have is talent retention. Nurse get well-trained, work a while then split. Earley said they have about a 20% turnover rate, which is way too high. (I wouldn't be surprised if JPS starts an aggressive campaign to keep their talent.)
• Earley instituted a chair policy in the hospital. A folding chair hangs behind the door of the hospital rooms and doctors are required to remove the chair and set it next to patients so that they can be at eye-level with them to talk.
• There are so many electronic and networked aspects of healthcare in general and especially within the hospital, but not much in their communication. Yet.

During the Q&A period, someone asked how do they tell the JPS story. Earley responded with a smile, "we hired J.R. Labbe."

Jill "J.R." Labbe is the former editorial director for the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram. I think this is an intriguing move for JPS and for Labbe. I'm interested to see how she can bring her skills to the other side of the news for storytelling and work from within the organization. She expressed some parting words in the newspaper about her new role:

While my responsibilities as vice president of communications and community affairs at JPS will differ greatly from what I've been doing the past 20 years -- and the irony of going from inflicting pain on government employees to being a government employee is not lost -- my love for this community and the people who call it home will not.

Wise move, JPS.

Robert Earley concluded by letting attendees know that others are welcome. They'd appreciate more people coming to JPS and seeing first-hand what's happening and how things are changing for the better. There's work to be done and it's wonderful to see organizational communications and community relations take starring roles in the process for this organization.
-------------------------------------------------
This is cross-posted from the Next Communications blog by Richie Escovedo, Fort Worth PRSA 2012 VP of Programs.

Fort Worth Media Panel - Learn from the Locals

The first program of the year did not disappoint.

Those hoping to get insight from the Fort Worth 2011 Media Panel heard from editors about imminent publication changes, social media trends, and tips plus preferences for the local PR professional-journalist working relationship.

Below are highlights from each speaker:

Maricar Estrella, Fort Worth Star-Telegram Social Media Editor:

• The Star-Telegram is placing more emphasis on the key role social media plays in news production with the creation of her position last year.
• Mari shared examples of how Facebook or Twitter postings have led to breaking news, albeit, after a thorough journalistic follow-up.
• Mari also shared that she is a blogger on the mom2momdfw.com site.
• When sending photos or other attachments, be aware that there’s a 10mb size limit.
• The following addresses help those wishing to connect with the paper through social media: Facebook: www.facebook.com/fwstar; Twitter: @startelegram; @dfwsuperbowl @maricare (use hashtag #sbst to tweet your Super Bowl experience; best tweet will be featured); Gowalla Super Bowl Trip: http://gowalla.com/trips/27156; FourSquare: @maricar estrella
• Email Mari at: maricar@star-telegram.com

Robert Francis, Fort Worth Business Press Editor

• Robert let everyone know to watch for changes soon on the Business Press website.
• There’s a new owner and perhaps you’ve heard of him before: Rich Connor.
• Be sure to sign up for Business Press e-mail alerts, which offer local, breaking business news.
• Keep in mind their weekly deadlines. No need to send notices for events happening after publication.
• Email Robert at: rfrancis@bizpress.net
  

Lois Norder, Fort Worth Star-Telegram Managing Editor

• While newspaper print circulation numbers have gone down, the paper is more widely read – even globally – than ever before.
• Consider always copying the newsroom (newsroom@star-telegram.com) when sending a release or story idea. Chances are that the reporter who used to cover your beat topic has changed positions.
• Stay away from attachments for news delivery when possible – editors like the convenience of cutting and pasting pertinent facts from an email text vs. a PDF.
• Email Lois at: lnorder@star-telegram.com
• BONUS: For those who didn’t get the handout from Lois Norder, she was kind enough to share that information for us to post here. Thanks Lois!

How to get your press release noticed by the Star-Telegram:

1. Put the local angle in the subject line. We look for those that highlight local people or places or issues.
2. Contact the right people. That’s plural, because we have a family of publications, including community newspapers, magazines such as Panache and Indulge and our websites. Call to ask who covers a topic if you haven’t touched base in a while. Be sure to also copy your release to newsroom@star-telegram.com. Except for breaking news, we prefer information via email.
3. Include a contact name, phone number, and address. We require that for photos and story assignments. 
4. Make sure we can cut and paste key details. Don’t use read-only pdfs or other web-based forms that will only pick up an entire block of information. 
5. Time your release. Friday is too late to send information on long-planned weekend events. A month in advance is too soon, except for the biggest events when we want to save a date. For breaking news, send the release immediately and follow up.

Key contacts:

Newsroom@star-telegram.com — For all press releases

lnorder@star-telegram.com — Lois Norder, managing editor for news

cxwilliams@star-telegram.com — Celeste Williams, managing editor for sports and features

cmallette@star-telegram.com — Catherine Mallette, features editor

jfuquay@star-telegram.com — Jim Fuquay, business editor

etrainor@star-telegram.com — Gene Trainor, editor for Grapevine, Colleyville and Southlake weekly

amurray@kellercitizen.com — Alice Murray, editor of the Keller Citizen

nmatocha@thetimesregister.com — Nancy Matocha, editor for Roanoke, Westlake, Trophy Club and Haslet weekly

arogers@mansfieldnewsmirror.com — Amanda Rogers, editor of the Mansfield News-Mirror

mbaker@star-telegram.com — Max Baker, editor of the Arlington Citizen-Journal

lwinter@weatherford.com — Lance Winter, editor of the Weatherford Telegram

Discussion: Press Credentials for Non-Press Professionals

Image via Wikipedia

We are going to try something a little different in this space. Occassionally, chapter members will start an e-mail discussion over a topic where a group is CC'd in and then the "Reply to all" game is played. I will say often these discussions are interesting and lead to offline dialogue or other networking opportunities.

One such discussion recently developed:

GFW Chapter President, Andra Bennett, APR, sent out an e-mail concerning a PR ethics question raised by Fot Worth Star-Telegram columnist Bud Kennedy. Kennedy wrote:

"So when a PR person is gathering newsfilm -- Do they get a press credential?"

He was referencing this post in the Texas Politics Blog related Chuck McDonald, a Lobbyist/PR guy, having press credentials and being on the Texas House floor for Gov. Perry State of the State address.


The Discussion Begins
The ensuing e-mails were pretty thoughtful and interesting. At one point in the discussion I ask the group if anyone minded me putting some of this down for a blog post since others might benefit from the discussion.

I was given the green light, so here's what's been said on the issue:

Video news releases have been around for 20+ years. VNR-1 -- I never heard of them asking for "press credentials." They knew they were on the PR side. That is all changing now...

I personally do not think they should have press credentials if they are being paid by clients to support a lobbying function, whether they are "registered" as a lobbyist or not.

McDonald's website is a fine idea, but his mistake was that he didn't play by the rules, and that came back to bite him and cast (once again!) all PR people in a poor ethical light.

-=-=-=-=-

McDonald's tactics disgust me.  If we don't respect the news media as being a different animal from us, meriting the privilege of "press credentials," then we ultimately weaken the public's confidence in the news media. Which in turn weakens the impact we can have for our clients.

-=-=-=-=-

In this age of citizen media, any organization that seeks to restrict access to information on the base of credentialing is risking its reputation. It just doesn't make sense anymore. My 11 year old niece could shoot video from her phone that could be played on CNN -- so why shouldn't she and everyone like her have access to the same information at the same time?

-=-=-=-=-

I think there are three issues, or questions here:

1) Was what Chuck McDonald did okay, or was it wrong? Wrong. But, in my opinion, only because he was a registered lobbyist, and rules prohibit registered lobbyists from being on the floor of the Texas House when the chamber is in session.

2) Should PR people be able to obtain press credentials? Certainly. We're in the news business, one way or another. If press credentials are required for obtaining access to the gathering of information a public relations professional needs to perform his or her job, and the public relations professional obtains the credentials in an above-board, legal manner, what's the problem? For instance, yesterday IBM's CEO, Sam Palmisano, was at the podium with President Obama, talking about the economic stimulus plan and the support it was receiving from IBM and other corporations. To have full access to that historic moment, should an IBM public relations staff person, or a person from a public relations firm representing IBM, been able to request and receive through the White House press credentials to be a part of and capture in photographs, film and/or audio that moment for archives and IBM "promotional" purposes, without having to rely on getting material from the news media? Absolutely. Should a public relations person working with a press credential purport to be a part of the "news media?" Absolutely not. We should always be above board about who we are, what we are doing and what are our interest level and intent. As a matter of information, the material from Washington yesterday that is being posted internally within IBM is from the White House and media sources, such as CNN, the Wall Street Journal, etc., and is appropriately labeled as being from those sources. And with my PR hat on, you can check out some video here.

3) How should material be handled by a public relations person who has gotten the material via a press credential? Straight forward and in an honest manner. If the presentation of the material has been altered in any way, it should be designated as not being an actual representation of what took place. In other words, that it's not a news production, but rather a public relations production, on behalf of a "client." Thus, it's not only the manner in which the material is obtained, but also the manner in which the material is presented. With full disclosure in obtaining and using information, it then is up to the audiences to determine the validity and value of the information that is being communicated to them. In that regard, I had no problem with Shale.TV, since it was fully disclosed it was going to be a Chesapeake production and not a "news production," but as most of you know, I had some serious issues with the manner in which Shale.TV was introduced and communications that were associated with the launch, which ultimately turned into a no-go.

-=-=-=-=-

Very interesting issue. Great discussion. A few thoughts:

There needs to be a stand on defining journalism and/or degrees of journalism. Without licensing (God forbid), journalism is not as distinct a craft as it once was. As we see on the Web, anyone can practice journalism and claim to be a journalist. I'd guess that public perception of who/what journalists are still distinguishes professional journalists from amateurs and professional practitioners of communications for private- and public-sector entities.

Create a different credential for those who are not professional journalists but need access to an event, justifiably. I would not support "press" credentials for non-press folks. "Press" carries a distinct definition, legal boundaries and ethics. One needs to consider how this issue would play out in court. "Are you a member of the press, Ms. X?" No. "Then why were you claiming to be? Doesn't this credential you were wearing say 'Press'?"

Labeling a credential as "Press" instantly projects motivations, objectives and expectations that are distinct and not shared by other forms of communication.

Journalists' constituents are the public. Their motivation is, at least it should be, to present factual reporting, from spot to investigative, free of a private- or public-sector entity's aims. Enron comes to mind. Should Enron communicators have been issued "press" credentials as all of that coverage unfolded? I think not. Did those communicators deserve the same access to unfolding news events as the "press"? Absolutely. Was FEMA wrong to fake a "news" conference? Of course. Still, this is America after all and all things public are just that -- public. Last I heard, public relations practitioners are as "public" as any other person, journalist or not.

I recall a "Far Side" cartoon in which vultures were gathered around the corpse of a ranch hand. One vulture had put the decedent's hat on his head and was saying: "Hey, everybody, look at me! I'm a cowboy!" Right. Not that PR folks are vultures and journalists are dead meat. I'm just saying that "press" credentials should be issued only to practicing professional journalists. To be honest and ethical, let credentials label the press as such and come up with some other label for non-press.

-=-=-=-=-
What do you think? Please weigh in via comments. The floor is yours.